Batman v Superman

Reviewing this film is surreal. This is the film for me that I wanted to watch and love more than any other film I've ever watched. Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is visually ambitious, and there’s no denying that Zack Snyder has an incredible eye for crafting stunning frames. Many shots look like they’ve been ripped straight out of a renaissance painting—epic, dramatic, and dripping with symbolism. But while the cinematography shines in moments, the film stumbles when it leans too heavily on CGI, pulling the viewer out of the experience. It’s a mixed bag, blending breathtaking imagery with some visual missteps.

Visual Aesthetics

This film is a visual feast at its best. Snyder’s signature style is all over it: high-contrast lighting, rich shadows, and a warm, muted color palette that gives the entire movie a painterly, almost mythic quality. Batman in silhouette against the Bat-Signal, Superman hovering godlike above a flood of onlookers, Wonder Woman stepping into battle—all these frames are iconic and bursting with dramatic energy.

However, the film’s heavy reliance on CGI undermines this aesthetic at times. Doomsday, for example, looks like a clunky, outdated video game boss rather than the terrifying creature he’s meant to be. Similarly, the scene where Superman absorbs the sun’s energy in the final battle falls flat. Instead of feeling majestic or awe-inspiring, it looks like a cutscene from a PS3 game, which is disappointing given how emotionally charged that moment should have been.

Storytelling through Cinematography

The cinematography works hard to elevate the film’s larger-than-life story. Snyder uses framing and lighting to convey the characters’ mythic status. Superman is often shot from low angles, bathed in heavenly light, while Batman is shrouded in shadow and darkness. The contrast between them visually underscores their ideological clash, which is one of the movie’s core themes.

One standout sequence is the nightmare vision of the desolate, apocalyptic future. The camera work here, paired with the gritty, desaturated visuals, creates a sense of chaos and foreboding that perfectly sets up the stakes for the story’s larger conflicts.

That said, there are times when the storytelling through visuals feels a bit heavy-handed. Some shots are so overtly symbolic they verge on melodrama, which can take you out of the moment instead of pulling you deeper in.

Camera Work

The camera work in Batman v Superman is as dynamic as the characters it portrays. Snyder’s use of slow motion is one of his hallmarks, and it’s on full display here—most notably in the warehouse fight sequence where Batman dismantles a group of thugs. The slow-motion punches and grapples give the action a brutal, visceral weight, making it one of the best-shot fight scenes in the film.

The handheld, shaky camera style during the Battle of Metropolis flashback brings a raw, ground-level perspective to Superman’s earlier destruction, effectively making you feel the human cost of the superhuman clash.

On the flip side, some of the fast-paced action sequences—particularly those involving heavy CGI—lack the clarity and focus that would make them truly impactful. The chaotic camera movements during the Doomsday fight feel more disorienting than engaging, and that’s a missed opportunity.

Technical Mastery

Let’s dig into the gear that brought Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice to life, because this is where things get interesting. Zack Snyder and cinematographer Larry Fong used a mix of digital cameras to capture the film’s iconic visuals. Most of it was shot with the ARRI ALEXA XT Plus and RED Epic Dragon cameras. These are digital workhorses, chosen for their ability to capture sharp, high-resolution images with incredible dynamic range, which was crucial for Snyder’s high-contrast lighting style.

The ARRI ALEXA XT Plus was primarily used for scenes requiring a more grounded, filmic texture. Its natural color science excels at rendering skin tones and subtle shadow details, which makes it a great choice for the close-up, emotional beats—like the intense face-offs between Bruce and Clark. The RED Epic Dragon, on the other hand, was deployed for sequences requiring greater flexibility in resolution and frame rates, such as high-energy action scenes. It’s also known for its ability to retain sharpness and color accuracy under extreme lighting conditions, which was crucial for scenes like the apocalyptic “Knightmare” sequence.

The production relied heavily on Panavision Primo Anamorphic lenses, known for their ability to create a slightly distorted, dreamy aesthetic with rich, oval-shaped bokeh and subtle lens flares. These lenses helped emphasize the larger-than-life, mythic tone Snyder was going for. In scenes like Wonder Woman’s heroic entrance or Superman hovering in the light, the lenses added a sense of grandeur and timelessness.

The choice of anamorphic lenses for much of the film speaks to Snyder’s intent to craft a visual epic—these lenses exaggerate the scale and drama, giving scenes a cinematic, operatic feel. This works beautifully in scenes like the Batman warehouse fight or the wide shots of Gotham and Metropolis, where the anamorphic lenses emphasize the depth and scale of the environments.

However, the reliance on digital cameras paired with extensive CGI became a double-edged sword. While the ARRI and RED setups are industry-leading, they sometimes struggled to seamlessly integrate the CGI-heavy scenes. This is most noticeable in the Doomsday battle, where the digital sheen of the creature contrasts sharply with the otherwise textured, filmic aesthetic.

Use of Space and Environment

The environments in Batman v Superman are as much a part of the story as the characters themselves. Gotham is gritty and oppressive, with towering skyscrapers and narrow alleys that reflect Batman’s world of fear and violence. In contrast, Metropolis is bright and open, representing Superman’s hopeful, larger-than-life presence—though its destruction is a grim reminder of his unintended consequences.

One standout sequence is the Senate explosion. The use of space in this scene is chilling—the camera lingers just long enough on the crowded hearing room before the blast, creating a moment of gut-punch silence. It’s an excellent example of how space and pacing can amplify tension.

The final battle, however, is where things falter. The battleground is a CGI-heavy wasteland of rubble and fire, which lacks the tactile realism of the earlier settings. It feels generic and uninspired, making the climax less impactful than it could have been.

Consistency and Intent

The cinematography in Batman v Superman is ambitious and consistent with Snyder’s style, but it doesn’t always serve the story effectively. There’s a clear intent to craft a visual epic that feels larger than life, and for the most part, that’s achieved. However, the reliance on CGI and some overly stylized choices dilute the impact of the more grounded, emotionally resonant moments.

While the film’s visuals are undoubtedly striking, they can sometimes feel like they’re trying too hard to impress, rather than allowing the story to speak for itself. It’s a case of style slightly overshadowing substance.

Conclusion

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is a visually ambitious film with moments of genuine brilliance. The painterly frames, dramatic lighting, and mythic imagery are stunning, and there’s no denying Zack Snyder’s talent for creating iconic shots. But the film’s over-reliance on CGI and some distracting stylistic choices hold it back from being truly great.

My Favourite Frames